NHR July-September 2018: Homoeopathic Treatment of Dengue: A Case Report

Homoeopathic Treatment of Dengue: A Case Report


Arpita Mondal*1, Arunava Nath2

  1. Consultant Homoeopathic Physician, Kolkata
  2. Postgraduate Trainee, Dept. of Organon of Medicine and Homoeopathic Philosophy, National Institute of Homoeopathy, Govt. of India

*Correspondence: 2017arpita.mondal@gmail.com


Abstract

Dengue fever, also known as ‘break bone fever’, is an infectious tropical disease caused by the dengue virus. Homoeopathy has a long record of success in the treatment of epidemic conditions. Selection of homoeopathic medicines depends upon the individual responses to infection, severity of disease and clinical presentation of the case. In this report, a case presented with symptoms with positive blood reports for dengue and was homoeopathically managed with medicines based on totality of symptoms. Though the patient suffered from post-dengue complications, the sequelae were managed by intervention with ‘anti-miasmatic’ treatment. A need for prospective studies is warranted to precisely define the role of homoeopathy in treating dengue fever.

Keywords

Dengue fever; Homoeopathy; Case report


Introduction:

Dengue is an acute viral infection characterized by biphasic febrile episode (giving the typical saddleback temperature curve of dengue), severe headache, myalgia and morbilliform rash caused by dengue virus (Flavivirus; Toga virus).The causative virus is usually harboured by the female mosquito Aedes aegypti and transmitted to man during bite. The incubation period is 3-15 days (average 7-10 days). The virus has four serotypes and each serotype has more than five different genotypes. The rising level of dengue infections has become a serious international concern. This increase in dengue transmission may be due to a number of factors, including fluctuations in temperature and humidity, population growth, more long-distance travel, growing urban areas, lack of sanitation, and poor mosquito control. The higher numbers may also be the result of better surveillance and official reporting of dengue cases. Since the mid-1990s, epidemics of dengue in India have become more frequent, especially in urban zones, and have quickly spread to new regions, such as Orissa, Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram, where dengue was historically non-existent. The epidemiology of dengue in India was first reported in Madras (now Chennai) in 1780, and the first outbreak occurred in Calcutta (now Kolkata) in 1963; subsequent outbreaks have been reported in different parts of India. Both Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are the main competent vectors for dengue virus in India. The number of dengue cases has increased 30-fold globally over the past five decades. Dengue is endemic in more than 100 countries and causes an estimated 50 million infections annually. Nearly 3.97 billion people from 128 countries are at risk of infection. The WHO regions of Southeast Asia (SEA) and the western Pacific represent ~75% of the current global burden of dengue.

IDENTIFICATION

Name of the Patient: Mr. Debu Raha. Age: 53 years. Sex: Male. Religion: Hinduism. Occupation: Gate keeper. Address: Jorabagan, Kolkata 700006. Date of first visit: 10.08.2013 at Late Prativa Sundari Ghosh Chikittshalaya Charitable Dispensary.

 

 

 

Date Main complaints Generalities Clinical findings Diagnostic assessments Prescription and advices
10.8.13 Malaise since yesterday followed by fever on 10.08.2013 [temp.

102.2°F] accompanied with chill. Hammering headache, soreness in eyes, severe bone pains and backache were also present.

Appetite: Poor with bitter taste in the mouth.

Thirst: Profuse but drinking caused bitter vomiting.

Stool: Voided once in the morning, normal in consistency and color.

Urine: Clear. Sleep: Sound. Thermal: Ambithermal

General tendency to catch cold. Patient was mentally anxious.

Face: Anxious   Built: Avg. Decubitus: Of choice     Nutrition: Avg.  Nervous system:         Alert, conscious, jerks normal Cardiovascular system: S1, S2 audible. Pulse: 98/min. BP: 130/78 mm of Hg. Tongue coated dirty. Peristaltic sounds normal. Respiratory system: Rate18/min. Breath sounds were normal. It might be a case of viral fever. Advised blood tests for total and differential count, malaria parasite and dengue NS-1 antigen. Medicine was selected as per totality of symptoms.

 

Rx       Eupatorium perfoliatum 30/4 doses twice daily for 2 days.

12.8.13 Fever came down but did not touch the base line. Temp. 99.4°F. Moreover there was intense pain in the long bones and joints of the body. Same findings as before except Appetite: Better than before. Thirst: Profuse but vomiting relieved to some extent. General Survey: Same findings as before.

Systemic examination:

Same findings as before except Cardiovascular  System:

Pulse 90/min.

BP120/78 mm Hg

Advised blood tests. Reports showed leucopenia; WBC count

3800/cu.mm, platelet count 1,70,000/cmm and dengue NS-1 antigen reactive. Provisional diagnosis: Non- hemorrhagic dengue.

Medicine was selected as per totality of symptoms.

 

Rx

Eup. perf. 30/

2 doses, twice a day.

Diet advised: Daily intake of boiled and easily digestible food, fresh fruits, vegetables, plenty of water, unsweetened fruit juices, nutritious soups, ORS and 25 ml juice of crushed papaya leaves twice daily.

13.8.13 Temp. 99.6°F but there was body ache & backache, agg. rest, amel. continuous motion. Appearance of erythematous rash over the body esp. neck region. Same finding as before except Thirst: Profuse with no vomiting. General Survey: Same findings as before.        Systemic examination:    Same findings as before except Alimentary system:

Tongue dry and red at the edges. Cardiovascular  System: Pulse 74/min. BP 120/80 mm of Hg

Same as before Medicine was selected as per totality of symptoms

 

Rx                    Rhus toxicodendron 30/2 doses               once daily for 2 days

15.8.13 Fever 101.8°F with appearance of morbilliform rash over the trunk except face.            Arthralgia and myalgia were gradually increasing. Same findings as before. General Survey: Same findings as before. Systemic examination: Same findings as before except Cardiovascular  System:         Pulse 88/min. BP 130/82 mm of Hg. Same as before. Advised blood tests:  Anti- dengue IgM and anti- dengue IgG antibodies. Medicine was selected as per totality of symptoms.

Rx                    Rhus toxicodendron 30/4 doses twice daily for 2 days

18.8.13 Temp 98.2°F.

Rashes over the body subsided. Only slight weakness remained.

Same findings as before Same findings as before Condition improved further Selected medicine was allowed to act and the patient was prescribed with placebo and was advised to come for follow up.
28.8.13 Low backache

and pain in the limbs

Same findings as before but the patient had fear of impending disease.

Desire for sweets, cold drinks. Bathing habit- Irregular.

Sleep disturbed as warmth of bed was intolerable. Dreams of being bitten by dogs.

General tendency to catch cold.

General Survey: Same findings as before. Systemic examination: Same findings as before except

Cardiovascular system: Pulse 72/min, BP 120/80 mm of Hg.

Post-dengue complication (mild) Anti-miasmatic constitutional medicine selected on proper indications

 

Rx

Sulphur 200/ 1 dose once a day followed by placebo once daily for 1 month

28.9.13 No complaints Same findings as before but fear of impending disease remained no more. Same findings as before Markedly improved Selected constitutional medicine was allowed to act and placebo was given for further 2 weeks

 

Results

Generally, DF patients with NS1 positivity go on to become seropositive for IgM by day 5. The case presents with NS-1 +ve at diagnosis but became IgM + ve by day 5, while IgG was NR. In the end anti- miasmatic treatment was given on proper indications to correct the susceptible constitution resulting from the permeation of the underlying chronic miasm.

Discussion

This case study was significant because the prescriptions were based on the principles of homoeopathy, which considered the individual signs and symptoms of every patient for remedy selection. In this report, only the clinical picture of a single case was presented. Further larger studies on the feasibility and the extent to which individualized homoeopathy may be employed in dengue affected areas need to be conducted with more adept clinical designs with methodological rigor. According to Hahnemann, dengue is sporadic and epidemic disease and its treatment is mentioned in §§100, 101 and 102 of Organon of Medicine (5th and 6th editions). It  may  be  considered  as an  acute miasm  usually  of  the recurring  type (if  epidemic) . In Organon of Medicine (§73 F.N. 1), Hahnemann reminded us that any ‘general name’ given to a fever is unimportant, except when there is a clear miasma identified. Our sole focus remains, to observe the totality of the fever, perceive its homoeopathic characteristics and identify the accurate similimum.  The diagnosis of the infecting miasma simply assists in the management of the acute phase and determining the prognosis of the case. In Organon of Medicine (§235), Hahnemann hints that the most valuable symptoms of the patients are seen  in the apparently healthy state when  the acute/paroxysmal symptoms are over and  the  patient  has  returned  to  his/her  latent  miasmatic  stage.  This article was an attempt to depict an evidence based case report of dengue fever. In the words of Sir William Osler “To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to the sea at all….”.

Conclusion

Homoeopathy has a long record of success in the treatment of epidemic conditions.  Despite the arduous challenges posed by multiplicity of viral serotypes, dengue can be tackled with proper homoeopathic treatment which is holistic and individualized as the selection of the homoeopathic medicine depending upon the individual response to infection.

Bibliography

  1. Das PC. Text book of Medicine. Sixth edition. Kolkata: Current Books International; July, 2016.
  2. Dengue fever. February 9, 2018 [Cited February12, 2018]. Available from: http://www.en.wikipedia.org.
  3. Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine, translated from fifth edition, with an appendix by R.E. Dudgeon, with additions and alterations as per sixth edition by William Boericke. Reprint edition. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Private Limited; 2004.
  4. Kapse A. Dengue illness. Quart Med Rev. 2013;64(3):3-4.
  5. Mahesh S, Mallapa M, Vithoulkas G. Could homeopathy become an alternative therapy in dengue fever? An example of 10 case studies. J Med Life 2018;11(1):75-82.
  6. Mutheneni SR, Morse AP, Caminade C, Upadhyayula SM. Dengue burden in India: recent trends and importance of climatic parameters. Emerg Microb Infect. 2017;6:e70. doi:10.1038/emi.2017.57.
  7. Rohan KM. Facts you need to know about dengue. September18, 2015. [Cited February12, 2018]. Available from: http://www.pantomath.xyz.

Consent for publication: A written consent for publication had been obtained from the patient.

Funding: None

Conflict of interest: None

Acknowledgements:  The authors acknowledge the patient for his cooperation.

 


Cite this article as: Mondal A, Nath A. Homoeopathic treatment of dengue: A case report. National Homoeo Recorder 2018;14(3):na.

Leave a Reply